Why is it
more profitable to improve Quality than cut Costs?
Let me
begin by saying that I am no more against looking for a reduction in costs than
looking for "peace of mind".
But just as peace of mind cannot be pursued as an end in itself but is
rather the by-product of a certain way of living with others in the world, so
reduction in costs is the result of increased efficiency and effectiveness in
the processes of production, i.e. a by-product. If you aim for an efficient and
effective process for producing a quality product or service then you should
get a certain reduction in cost as a by-product. If you simply look to cut
costs in whatever way seems quickest and easiest then your aim will be off, and
so will your focus. You thereby run the risk of a lot of "collateral
damage", shooting whatever gets between you and your target.
In 1990
Rafael Aguayo wrote a book laying out the management philosophy and principles
of Dr. W. Edwards Deming (Dr.
Deming. The American Who Taught the Japanese About Quality). That was
twenty-four years ago. Reading it today I am amazed at how relevant and
apposite those principles still are. In that book (p. 33) Aguayo uses a simple
example to illustrate one way that quality increases profit. In this example it
is because of less rework.
If you
run a plant with a defect rate of 5 per 100, your revenue is limited to 95
saleable items per hundred but your costs are still for 100 items. Let's say
selling price is $1.00 per item; production cost is $90.00 per batch of 100
items.
Revenue:
$1 x 95
|
$ 95
|
|
Less
cost of production: $90 per 100
|
$ 90
|
|
Profit
|
$ 5
|
If you
improve production quality by about 5% such that there are zero defects, then…
Revenue:
$1 x 100
|
$100
|
|
Less
cost of production: $90 per 100
|
$ 90
|
|
Profit
|
$ 10
|
So, a
quality improvement of 5% in the production process has resulted in a 100%
increase in profits. Not too shabby. Ah, but you say that there is an
additional cost for improving the quality and reliability of production. Even
if we increase the cost of production by 5% to $94.50, that would still give us
a 10% increase in profits:
Revenue:
$1 x 100
|
$100.00
|
|
Less
cost of production: $94.50 per 100
|
$ 94.50
|
|
Profit
|
$ 5.50
|
The other
side of this coin is that a quality improvement in production can be expected
to translate into an improvement in the reliability and other quality
attributes of the finished product. That should have a knock-on effect on
enhanced customer satisfaction which, in turn, creates returning customers out
of once-off customers.
The moral
of the story?
"Look after the quality and the profit will take care
of itself" - W. E. Deming. These are not Deming's actual words but
the philosophy is his. This is similar to…
“Look after the customer and the business will take
care of itself” – attributed to Ray Kroc, founder of McDonald’s
No comments:
Post a Comment